I was given a list of questions and asked to choose three to exhaust upon in detail, here it is:
1) Discuss Bart’s persona as a rebel. Do you think his self-understanding (and the way this understandings plays out on The Simpons) supports Nietzsche’s claim that our identities are attempts to construct some sense of a chaotic world? Does Bart “create himself” through his rebellious actions?
In the episode “Bart’s Inner Child”, I believe that the holistic persona of Bart as a rebel is revealed. Throughout the seasons, Bart has been the character that breaks rules, challenges authority and unnerves Lisa. It would seem that Bart does this to be his own unique person, aside from society and laws. This is not the case, however, because as we see in the episode “Bart’s Inner Child”, when everyone else decides to leave rules and reason behind, Bart beings to think he has lost himself. All that Bart’s identity was based on was doing the opposite of what others would do-or think they had to do, and finding security in being unique in living out that process.
Instead of paralleling with Nietzsche’s claim that our identities are attempts to construct sense for this world, Bart creates a self image that is shallow and easily lost. Nietzsche hounds on the idea that:
“One thing is needful.- To “give style” to one’s character- a great and rare art! It is practiced by those who survey all the strengths and weaknesses of their nature and then fit them into an artistic plan until every one of them appears as art” (Gay Science p. 232)
In view of Bart’s persona, I see it defined as only an opposition to rules and authority and nothing more. When his identity is lost, he does not “survey all the strength and weaknesses” of his inner self, he turns to Lisa for help. For example, at the end of the episode “Bart’s Inner Child”, he seeks refuge in Lisa, who tells him that “this is your chance to develop a new and better identity.” his response being “…Just tell me what to do”. (Bart’s Inner Child)
In conclusion, I do not believe that Bart “creates himself” through his rebellious actions. He clearly follows a pattern of opposition and when that pattern is altered he is lost and upset.
Word Count: 324
3) Is Mr. Burns a virtuous person?
If you analyze Mr. Burns by likeable, friendlier virtues, he would surely fall short of being virtuous. However, if you view Burns from his role on The Simpsons as a business person and leader, you would see that he indeed has a virtuous nature.
According to Aristotle, there are conditions for right action and that is, “First [the agent] must know that he is doing virtuous actions; second, he must decide on them, and decide on them for themselves; and third, he must also do them from a firm and unchanging character”. (Ethics 1105a30 – 1105b) In the episode, “The old man and Lisa”, Burns looses all of his fortunes, then builds himself back up from scratch. While most would want to give up when a situation gets so dire that you lose everything, Mr. Burns steps up to the plate and is ready to start anew. According to Aristotle’s condition, Mr. Burns was aware that in order to gain back his business he needed to be looking for opportunities to do so, be hard working with his idea and also be able to motivate his employees. Once he decided to follow through on this, he did not once waiver from his firm character and ultimately obtained his goal; he bought back the power plant.
This “rags to riches” experience proves that Mr. Burns is indeed hard working, opportunistic and proves that he has a strong will power. Aristotle’s golden mean would apply to his characteristics. For example, the extreme’s of hardworking would be an excess of working and laziness and Mr. Burns’s point of greatest virtue, in this case, would be closer to the extremes of excess of working due the severity of the situation.
Mr. Burns is not a husband or a father and seems to have no friends except for maybe his assistant, Smithers, who seems to fear him more than love him. This lack of relationships leaves Mr. Burns without the virtues of sensitivity or empathy for the people and things around him. This flaw is what makes Lisa hesitate when deciding to help Mr. Burns and ultimately destroys their partnership in the recycling plant. I do not believe that you should hold the lack of these virtues against Mr. Burns because the innate flaws in every character of The Simpsons is what perpetuates the story from week to week. If Homer lost his character flaw of ignorance, his role would change and therefore most of the predicaments of each episode would simply not exist. If Barney practiced temperance, he would no longer serve his role as a comedic drunk and so on and so forth. Mr. Burns has a role, a job and a life style that are conducive to his virtuous traits.
Word Count: 457
1) Does Maggie have any heuristic value on The Simpsons?
At first glance, it does not seem that Maggie plays a significant role in The Simpson family, let alone having any heuristic value. With a closer look, you can see that she indeed serves a function and has heuristic value. In the book The Simpsons and Philosophy, one of the authors, Eric Bronson, argues that just because Maggie is unable to speak, does not mean she has nothing meaningful going on in her head or cannot interact with her world by having an important effect. This misconception in common in Western thought; that values expression through words. This value in spoken words has been apparent since Socrates, who emphasized discussing and arguing ideas to obtain truth, and even as recent as the twentieth-century philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, who believed that a person’s life is understood by his/hers interactions and most of those interactions are done with words.
In the episode “Tree House of Horrors VI”, Maggie saves her siblings from Willie by using her pacifier to seal up his spider suit vent, causing him to explode. Maggie defies Western tradition by not using words, but her through her silence; she acts to get reveal that she loves her siblings and wants to save their lives. Bronson’s view on Eastern thought is: “Words serve only to destroy inner peace. We become too attached to our words and easily talk away the grandeur and mystery behind our lives.” (Simpons and Philosophy pg. 42) Eastern enlightenment values silence and warns against foolish words. Perhaps Homer should take heed to his daughter’s ways. In my opinion, Maggie serves as an example of wisdom according to Eastern tradition.
In the episode “Itchy and Scratchy and Marge”, Maggie serves as the “canary in the mine” for the potential dangers of violent television. After watching an episode of Itchy and Scratchy, Maggie sneaks up on Homer and hits him with a mallet. Because Maggie is so young and innocent, she often mimics the world around her without inhibitions. This lack of inhibitions brings to light the subtle dangers that would go otherwise unnoticed. Maggie is an understated focal point to which her family learns from.
Word count: 357